mr. havisham

Miss Havisham in Dickens’s Great Expectations: still in her wedding dress, still standing by the wedding cake, emotionally frozen at the moment when her bridegroom deserted her decades earlier; now with grey hair, with mice running round the decayed cake, spiders spinning webs unchecked in the dark, candle-lit room, the table still set for the wedding breakfast….

* * *

Yup, that’s the way I now see Plan C:

he’s emotionally frozen at the moment of his wife’s death.

He’s overcome with guilt about all the things he shouldn’t have done to her, determined to make it all up to her now, to preserve her memory, idealize her, recreate, after her death, the marriage they should have had, that he wishes they had had, that they can have now if he only preserves his life and their house exactly as they were when she was alive.

picture copyright Dickens Museum, London

* * *
But he’s not entirely frozen.

Only ten months after her death, he begins dating the first of 84 women, because he wants to live in the present. He wants another woman, companionship, a lively and fulfilling sex life, friends, joy, play, everything. He wants to move on.

* * *
Dating 84 women, none of the dates evolving into significant relationships, he is able to preserve the old life, because nothing comes along to threaten it. He doesn’t know he is Mr. Havisham; he thinks he is moving on, meeting new people, frantically trying to find a replacement for, maybe even an improvement on, the original wife of 36 years.

Nothing challenges him to realize his paralysis, because the 84 women don’t require any movement of the emotions.

* * *
Until February 2008, when he meets me.
* * *
At first, he constructs me as a reincarnation of W, his late wife: in our very first phone call, he talks about her. ‘My wife was a beautiful woman,’ he says, and I wonder, Why is he telling me that? How inappropriate, how odd! – but whatever.

On our first date, he tells me that he met W, also, on a cold Sunday in February, and tells me every detail of their meeting.

On our first date?!

Uh oh. Red flag.

Only a week after we meet, he gives me the last piece of jewelry he ever gave her, saying, in a note, that he wants the last for her to be the first for me, claiming that ’she would have wanted it’ that way.

Oh yeah?

* * *
And yet, several weeks later, when I spend the night at his (their) house the first time, the second afternoon he bursts into tears at the kitchen table, sobbing that he ’should have apologized to her’ before she died.

I’m not so sure of that, myself.

If she was really angry at anything and felt the need of apology, she would have asked for it. She wasn’t timid or too shy to ask for what she wanted: she was strong and articulate. If she let certain behaviors of his slip by, she must not have wanted to talk about them. She knew what she was about.

* * *
And so for a few months Plan C vacillates between two lives, the new one with me, and the old one with W.

I try to give him back the necklace that was hers, but he refuses to accept it.

* * *

The second time I try, he does accept it. That was last weekend.

* * *
Crossing the Brooklyn Bridge on a beautiful sunny day in May, our first real expedition together, he stops, half way over, pauses, looks into the distance, and says sadly, ‘W would have loved this.’

* * *

The old life increasingly takes over: Plan C is not in the present. He strives to keep his old life in tact exactly — the little domestic rituals, the shopping, the anniversaries, the golf, and brushing the cat, the only living reminder of their common household.

I become a drag on him, a burden, a weight pulling him away from the life he is guiltily trying to preserve whole. It becomes an effort to visit me. He ceases to find pleasure in our life together, still in process, still evolving.
.
The only thing he looks forward to is golf.

* * *
I have become W. manquée.

She would have ‘let’ him golf on Saturdays.
She would not have disturbed him while he was reading the paper, would have disappeared upstairs into her study.
She would not have required entertainment while they were at home, would have done her own chores, led her own quiet life, let him enjoy his summer Saturdays in peace.
She would not have been demanding.

Sex with me becomes an affront to her: the more fun it is, the more offensive to her, the more destructive of that old life.

* * *

Seeing his therapist every week or so, he rarely mentions W, does not talk about his continuing mourning, and certainly does not talk about, indeed avoids at all costs, his guilt.

* * *
And so things deteriorate in his relationship with me, because I don’t behave the way W did — in his memories of her, at least — and I make demands in the present.

* * *
Things between us come to a crisis (described in the last 3 posts).

* * *
August is coming up, and with it their wedding anniversary (the 39th, it would have been) followed soon by the anniversary of her death.

* * *

Will we make it to August?

* * *
Only if he confronts his Mr. Havisham self. He’s got to — brace yourself for clichés now — fess up to his therapist, tell her truly about his relationship with W, get beyond the guilt, stop casting me as either W-reborn or anti-W, break free of all those volatile emotions, the wild vacillations between guilt and reverence, understand what he’s been doing, get beyond it all, and love me in the present.

* * *
Otherwise, I’m outta there.

* * *

Explore posts in the same categories: Plan C, Uncategorized

23 Comments on “mr. havisham”


  1. What a perfect analysis, Mimi. I remember so little of “Great Expectations” but I will NEVER forget Mrs. Havisham. A powerful character because so many of us see (or fear) that in ourselves.That we’ll never get past that one big hurt. It’s generous (and accurate) of you to see that this is Plan C’s crisis and not some terrible affront to you. However, it does affect you and you are correct in drawing the line as to what you will or won’t accept. And now it sounds like you are going through that “hindsight is 20/20″ phase that can drive anyone crazy. But love is a risk and you took it. And, like your commenters said in the previous post, the death knell on this relationship has yet to sound. Stay strong. Go enjoy some summer fun in NYC.
    Oh, my mom and nephew are in the City right now. She’s taking him there for the first time (he’s 18 and never left Southern California). So far NYC is treating them very well!


  2. thanks, dt; it came to me and i _had_ to write it out. it was So Clear.

    well, plan c and i are off monday for 10 days together in a european country where i do business, so we’ll see how that goes. i have a feeling it will go well, and therefore things will be indeterminate.

    this is a beautiful week to visit nyc — clear sunny weather most of the time. am going out now for my 3-mile walk, now that i’ve clarified my situation to my satisfaction (and yours!).

    -mimi


  3. Hope you have a terrific trip and try to sneak away to give us a European update!

  4. TakenGirl Says:

    Mimi, I am so sorry to hear that things are not going the way you would have wanted. But, at least this is all happening now and not years down the line. It sounds like Plan C really does need some time to evaluate and truly move on from W’s passing. He definitely needs to discuss this with his therapist and I was astonished to hear that he had not been discussing W with the therapist. I mean seriously! I can’t believe the therapist hasn’t been asking Plan C about W too, that seems to me to be an obvious set of questions to be asking him. Anyways, I think the trip to Europe will definitely be a good test of the relationship. When it comes down to it, put yourself first and take care of yourself and your needs, that’s what’s most important.


  5. thanks, TG, i’m feeling fine — feeling super strong, actually, and not entirely patient with Plan C, so our trip to this european country comes at a good moment. we’ll be in a totally new situation, with new people, new everything, so we’ll see how that works out.

  6. hostis toia Says:

    Just adding my voice to the eloquent chorus: sorry this is happening, but so glad that you have such a clear intellectual *and* emotional understanding of what is happening with Plan C.

    Like most of your friends, I am wary of seeing this as the end of anything — definitely a turning point of some kind, but direction unknown.

    All my best wishes for your trip … and beyond.


  7. ht, did you read the previous post also? that one makes this one clearer. thanks for yr wishes, and i’ll post from abroad.

  8. KikiChic Says:

    Mimi,

    I made up the term “matchdotcomaholic” for a man who reposted his profile after swearing he’d take it down. I’ve been reading about you and Plan C for months and was shocked! You do a great job of sorting it all and GOOD FOR YOU for pressing it until an explanation made sense. He may have felt bothered by it, but how can you trust him if it doesn’t make sense? I think all will go well in Europe. He’ll have plenty of space AND he’ll be away from the siren call of hometown routine. So your zip and adventure will shine Great dress for the wedding, by the way. I bet all the men will want to snag you.


  9. “the siren call of hometown routine” — how right!! excellent phrase. and — to mix metaphors entirely — it’s a siren call that keeps him frozen in his past. AND moreover he can golf in a New Place! that’s all been arranged for him. hoping for the best. thanks for yr comment. -mimi

  10. a&v Says:

    You know, one of my good friends recently married a widower who sounds very much like your Plan C. (My friend met this widower on an online dating site three months after he lost his wife!) Seeing how much the widower still grieved his wife (and rightly so, given the time frame) I gently advised my friend to run like hell. She didn’t.

    I don’t know Mimi … I hope this isn’t the end for you and Plan C, but you deserve a whole man. He sounds as if he may not be up to it yet.


  11. so how is yr friend’s marriage going?? the proof of the pudding is in the etc….

    plan c has GOT to talk to his therapist about Every Aspect of his marriage — and soon. it’s as i say at the end of this post. there’s only hope for us if he can get beyond the emotional paralysis that he isn’t really aware that he’s in. the fact that he got this involved w. me in the first place indicates that part of him does want to move on. but how strong is that ‘part’, and _can_ he move on? time will tell. and we’ll see how he does on our trip.

    - mimi

  12. anonymous Says:

    I agree, don’t sound the death knell yet – I’ll look forward to hearing about Europe and how that impacts things. And giving him a little space probably isn’t a bad thing – you started off so intensely, and believed so many things about each other from early on.

    I have an ongoing discussion with a friend of mine about ‘love at first sight’ – it seems to me that when you meet someone you make all sorts of attributions about them – and you might believe a bunch of things without a lot of data that cause you to think that this person is your soulmate. But then you learn more about that person, and it’s what happens then that causes you to frame what happened… sometimes, people will be completely wrong, and those relationships probably fizzle. Occasionally, some people are bound to be right, and they get to say ‘I knew him and loved him from the first moment’ and I think that sometimes, they learn that they were wrong, but that the reality is also awesome, and then they have to go through an adjustment period of resetting expectations…

    But he also has to realize that he has set some expectations with you by coming on so strong in the beginning, and that it’s unfair to then withdraw his intensity and call you ‘needy’ – you’re just responding normally to a vacuum where a couple of weeks ago there was light and noise.


  13. thanks, anon. it was almost before ‘first sight,’ unless that can mean ‘first sight’ of my profile picture. i still don’t entirely understand how he decided on me just from my profile, when he hadn’t w. the previous 84 women he dated….

    well, i’m having a Great Time withdrawing and letting him initiate all the communicating. it’s very satisfying: now he sends me 5 emails a day and i send him 1. he just ended his phone call ‘i love you,’ and i responded, ‘thank you.’
    !!
    he said, ‘don’t say that!’ and i said, ‘what do you want me to say?’ i can’t remember the rest, but i felt Really, Really good. and otherwise i was cheerful & chipper & upbeat,
    but not super chatty. i think this tactic is working.

  14. pt Says:

    If there’s any tactic that will work, it’s the “withdraw” tactic.

    Maybe tomorrow he will send you 10 e-mails and you will send him none.

    I think what anon says above is very wise.

    Mimi, what’s weird about what you say just above is that PlanC rejected you the first time ’round because you lived too far away. So deciding he loved you on the basis of the second profile and new pic….. well, I always thought that was a bit strange. Maybe it was a change in him that made you no longer live too far away, not a change in your pic. Just a thought.

    What is really noteworthy, however, is that with the Pervformer, you were totally the victim. You would not have been proactive and said “I’m outta here,” but rather let him take charge and make any/all decisions. This time, you are saying you will make a decision on the basis of PlanC’s behaviour, without waiting around sniveling until he makes a decision. I don’t like the word “empowerment,” but I do like the concept.


  15. yes, later i thought of reminding him that his first refusal to meet me was based on the ‘distance’ issue. but now i think the whole distance thing — at this phase of the relationship — is part of what i referred to as his emotional paralysis. part of him wants to keep his life just as it was when his wife died. btw the reason he began finally looking at nyc women was that he decided they were superior to (i.e. more interesting) the women who lived closer to him.

    well, with performer, the dump came as a complete surprise — tho in retrospect not entirely surprising. he didn’t mention it till he had made up his mind. in this case, it’s not a dump: it’s as described in the post above, ambivalence about what he wants.
    the withdrawal tactic has worked — so far — amazingly well. but the questions remain,
    what will he feel, and will i still want him? don’t know. but as RS said, Festina lente.


  16. Mimi,
    You are a strong capable woman and totally deserving of a whole and perfect partner! I agree with most comments that it is still to be determined that you are outta there, but I am in awe of your confidence and determination to not settle. You can totally find a zillion men online (I’m finding tons right now) who have a lot of great qualities. Although I agree that golf is not a deal-breaker, for me the “silence during the newspaper” would be, especially if he is allowed to talk and you are not. Have a great time in Europe. i wish you could post from the road!


  17. YAH, i _can_ post from abroad and plan to. i did last year — wrote my post about the man who sucked my toes from an internet cafe, where i was laughing so hard as i wrote i was afraid people would look over my shoulder. if you want to look that one up, go to
    http://sexagenarian07.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/update-from-abroad-toe-separators/
    i think the newspaper silence is one of those things that will be less of a problem if the main problem is solved, i.e. his emotional paralysis in august 2005. and as i said above, the ‘withdrawal’ technique appears to be working, at least for the past 2 days.
    my motto remains FESTINA LENTE.
    good luck w. yr dates.
    mimi

  18. pt Says:

    um, everyone, as a newspaper reporter, i declare and decree that it is fine if he wants to read the newspaper undisturbed. it really bugs me if someone tries to interfere with my newspaper stuff done my way. Plan C may have other weirdnesses that are worth complaining about, but this is emphatically not one of them.


  19. well, but: who’s allowed to talk? just plan c? or the woman in the room with him? i was sitting there in silence sunday morning, reading a section of the paper, when _he_ looked up and made a comment. i said, ‘i thought this was quiet time,’ and he said something to the effect that what was the point of reading the paper together if you couldn’t discuss what you were reading…….so i remarked that apparently there was a double-standard: he could talk, and i couldn’t.

    at any rate, this is still not the deal-breaker for me. i really don’t care about that. this past weekend he was in the ‘turmoil’ that he hadn’t yet acknowledged to me.

    it’s the person-to-notify-in-case-of-accident-or-emergency that’s the deal-breaker.
    i want a man who Insists that his name be on that form, that he know first if something terrible has happened to me.

    if plan c doesn’t feel that way — by, say, sometime in august — then that’s it.

    * * *

    i think my ‘withdrawal’ will make him realize my importance to him.
    but how _i’ll_ feel is something else.
    truly, i have no idea.

  20. Loverville Says:

    You sound very level-headed and insightful about all this. Everyone above has given excellent advice — and I agree that withdrawing a bit is a good plan.

    When do you leave for your trip?


  21. yeah, i do feel ‘level-headed’ and full of insight….not that i know yet where the insight will lead me.

    we leave on monday the 23rd. i’ll be posting from abroad; will have quite a bit to say, i think. looking forward to more posts from you on yr blog….any action?

    -mimi

  22. Kat with a K Says:

    Perhaps his relationship with you is the catalyst he needs to make himself deal with his wife’s death, and he will do so and then be able to move on into his life with you… or at least that’s what I’m hoping. Good luck on your trip!


  23. thanks, kat. well, first he has to talk to his therapist about his marriage, i think, and come to terms with it. but, as you say, his relationship w. me may be the catalyst.
    at the moment i couldn’t predict which way things will go. will post from abroad. mimi


Comment: